Written by Ted Jackson |
December 2013 |
When the CEOs of the nation’s two largest addictions treatment enterprises, on the for-profit side Andy Eckert of CRC Health Corp. and on the non-profit side Mark Mishek of Hazelden, step up with strong views on what they see as the limited prospects for growth on the residential/inpatient side, it’s certainly time for the rest of the industry to sit up and take notice,In a wide ranging interview with Treatment Magazine in early December, CRC’s Andy Eckert made clear that the payors were pretty much fed up with what they see as an increasing revolving door when it comes to primary care residential treatment. “The commercial insurers do not see value in terms of better outcomes in spending money funding endless residential primary care experiences,” says Eckert, pointing out that payors have recently approached CRC about starting a number of IOP and PHP programs linked to the detoxification and maintenance services delivered at CRC’s nationwide network of opiate specialty clinics, now by far the largest after CRC’s $58M deal to acquire the 22 Northeast opiate centers of Boston-based Habit OPCO. More Outspoken Hazelden CEO Mark Mishek has been even more outspoken, pronouncing the 28-day type residential model to be “dead” as a growth area while moving Hazelden toward outpatient clinic expansion both through acquisition and organic growth, as well as the announcement of plans to leverage the iconic Betty Ford brand beginning with a series of Southern California outpatient care centers.While SAMHSA data on industry-wide payor mixes has always been woefully out-of-date, and now amidst budget cutbacks seems to have disappeared altogether, the trend post-managed care when it comes to commercial payors has been unmistakable, with health insurers topping out in the 1980s paying somewhere between 30-40 percent of the nation’s total treatment bill, and falling from there to likely under 10 percent currently. Sober Living Growth
Dearth of Beds Except in the addictions “hubs” like the two just described and others that have formed in Arizona and places like Minnesota, there is in fact a dearth of sober living beds. On the non-profit side, the incredibly successful Oxford House has since the 1970s managed to set up everywhere. But at the locally controlled, democratically run Oxford Houses there are in many communities long waiting lists to get in. The Florida House An example of a successful new sober living operation, a highly structured program, is one that The Florida House, a rapidly expanding for-profit South Florida therapeutic community, started about two years ago. As Florida House CEO and founder Sherief Abu Moustafa saw opportunity in acquiring undervalued residential properties adjacent to the multi-acre Florida House campus in downtown Deerfield Beach, hebrought in Peter Marinelli to run a sober living operation that would form part of the soup-to-nuts treatment services operation that is now The Florida House. Marinelli is a traditionalist AA program director in every sense and runs the Florida House program very much along those lines. He spends much of his time on what has now, over the last several decades, become a very well developed Alcoholics Anonymous speaking cicuit, giving talks at the multitude of regional and national AA conferences that are held all over the U.S.every year. Says Marinelli: “The Florida House program is about helping people gain spiritual muscle before they re-enter society,” TJ |